Grub + Pub
Revenge of the hot dogs

blog by Ben Tsujimoto • October 26, 2011 @ 8:22am
As it turns out, no one really wanted to have the second public Common Council hearing in regard to food truck legislation. The Common Council didn’t think there was a need, the Food Truck Association’s Mitchell Stenger said the meeting was “not at [his] suggestion,” and Entrepreneurs for a Better Buffalo attorney Michael Kooshoian didn’t want to stay longer than he had to.
The purpose, then, was “to further air concerns from the community.” Who spoke out?
— Peter Gallivan, owner of a hot dog stand for 20 years in the Buffalo Place zoning district, expressed his concerns with the food trucks being allowed to roam freely, using the dreaded “Wild West” phrase. “I have a specific city-issued permit for a specific location,” he said, citing a Sept. 8 occurrence when a truck “stole” several of his customers at Ellicott and Goodrich.
A territorial complaint, Gallivan’s gripe is an obstacle primarily because it raises a zoning issue—if the legislation is different in the Buffalo Place district than the rest of the downtown area, what’s stopping other “districts” from forming their own treatments of mobile vendors? Why does Buffalo Place get special legislation for its zone? In sum, Gallivan basically fears nearby competition, using his 20 years of hot dog vending experience as a defense.
Kooshoian, representing the B & Ms (bricks and mortar restaurants, the stationary variety) and other entrepreneurs (he made sure we grouped the smaller mobile vendors here too), focused on the zoning issue as the major delay in proceedings. He mentioned after the Common Council meeting that he never agreed to the 100 foot radius for food trucks to operate—that decision was made solely by the Food Truck Association, and Kooshoian would prefer to base the legislation zone-by-zone.
Like many of the food truck detractors, Gallivan also questioned how much the food trucks were charged to operate Buffalo Place. The costs were proportional by size—hot dog vendors pay $315 for a permit, while Peter Cimino and co-owner Chris Dorsaneo of Lloyd Taco Truck shelled out $1400 for their spot on Main and Mohawk.
— David Marotto, owner of Dough Bois, a pizza place at the corner of Niagara St. and Franklin, was very demonstrative too, but his reasons lacked Gallivan’s clarity. Rather disjointedly, Marotto raised concerns over where he should file complaints—to the city or Buffalo Place—and why food trucks didn’t have to pay the permit fees that he faces regularly (citing a $400 patio fee in particular).
— Christina Walsh, Director of Activism and Coalitions for the Institute of Justice, traveled to Buffalo on her own dime to lend a larger perspective. Her primary point was that food trucks were making a significant sacrifice by proposing the 100 foot radius (away from any B & M) rule, and that the overarching demand on food trucks around the U.S. is to meet sanitary regulations.
“[The Food Truck Association] has had a mature response,” Walsh said. “They just want to work, to be a part of the system—they don’t want to get kicked out of their seats.”
“Buffalo has a chance to be on the cutting edge of a wave of reform,” Walsh says, and that’s not a phrase you hear too frequently. For now, though, that reform has been tabled again, resulting in frustration for mobile food vendors. Food Truck Association consultant Miles Gresham raised a good point: why should the brick and mortars care if this legislation moves slower than molasses? They’re not the ones being hurt by it.
Leave a Comment
Comments
Galleries
Disco fever at Buffalo Bisons’ Fridaynightbash! - PHOTOS
Posted on: May 25, 2013 @ 8:24am
21st Annual AIDS Walk Buffalo at Hoyt Lake - PHOTOS
Posted on: May 19, 2013 @ 8:42am
Lake Erie Pub Crawl - PHOTOS
Posted on: May 18, 2013 @ 3:07pm
Mercedes-Benz Buffalo Fashion Week Mixer - PHOTOS
Posted on: May 17, 2013 @ 8:30am
Buffalo Niagara 360 Happy Hour For-A-Cause at Saturn Club - PHOTOS
Posted on: May 16, 2013 @ 9:58am
Recent Comments
“I’m not supposed to be within two hundred feet of a school… or a Chuck E. Cheese.”
By Vinny Cicatello about CONTEST: Win advanced passes to 'The Hangover Part III'.
Stu: “She is wearing my grandmother’s Holocaust ring.”
Alan: “I didn’t know they gave out rings at the...
By Derek Lutz about CONTEST: Win advanced passes to 'The Hangover Part III'.
Phil: “The Best Little Chapel, do you know where that is?”
Dr. Valsh: “I do. It’s at the corner of get a map and f**k...
By Paul Westover about CONTEST: Win advanced passes to 'The Hangover Part III'.
I shouldn’t be here. I’m not supposed to be within 200 feet of a school. Or a Chuck E. Cheese.
By Evan Barrick about CONTEST: Win advanced passes to 'The Hangover Part III'.
Phil Wenneck: You’re not really wearing that are you?
Alan Garner: Wearing what?
Phil Wenneck: The man purse. You...
By Oralia about CONTEST: Win advanced passes to 'The Hangover Part III'.
Buffalo.com Newsletter

If Gallivan’s comments were disjointed, they could not possible be as disjointed as the article itself. Author Ben Tsujimoto introduces the term “B&M” without any explanation of what it means (after several moments thought, it came to me that it is shorthand for Brick and Mortar, but one should not have to think about what shorthand terms mean, they should be explained in the first occurrence). Also, the names Cimino and Chris Dorsaneo are introduced without any explanation of who they might be, only that they paid $1,400 for a permit at Main and Mohawk.
Poor writing only denigrates the subject. The article in the Buffalo News of Sunday 10/22/2011, Make College Count with a Solid Curriculum, should be read by Tsujimoto, and he should find a university that offers one.
Thank you for the corrections, Ken. They have been addressed. As for questioning my education, I have no comment for you.—Ben T.